I woke up this morning so very much hoping that the sick, sick feeling in my stomach after facing what Senator Jack Westwood has done would be gone.
It's not.
Did Westwood include the statement in his letter about a "strong link between abortion and breast cancer" to hurt me because he was so angry about the content of my email?
Why would anyone write something so cold and insensitive to a person battling breast cancer? Especially after losing his first wife to cancer and watching his present wife battle ovarian cancer...
I mean, it's fine to list what you consider to be your legislative accomplishments but then to end the letter with the crack about abortion and breast cancer being linked??
My God.
Below you will find Westwood's letter he mailed to me in response to an email I sent to him stating that I am going to work for his defeat in November. During his tenure (12 years) in Frankfort, Westwood has not taken, in my opinion, a proactive, aggressive approach in crafting and helping pass strong legislation for women. That means more than simply casting a vote or going with the flow of his Republican senate colleagues. After 12 years, the people of Kentucky deserve a real fighter to represent them.
Someone referred to me as the "Pink Warrior." Jack Westwood is only beginning to find out exactly what that means.
Dear Ms. Brumback,
Thank you for sharing your views regarding women's health issues and for the kind words which you introduced your email. I understand how being affected personally with a disease can change one political positions, and I wish you success in your battle against breast cancer. My first wife died of cancer in 1973, and fortunately my current wife is a "cancer survivor" after having had surgery to treat ovarian cancer. Because of the impact cancer has had on the two most important women in my life, I was, frankly, taken aback with your comment that my political "representation [has been] void of taking a strong stand for early cancer screenings."
You indicated you spent some time looking at my record for the legislation that is a priority for you now (i.e. cancer screening and women's health issues) and concluded that I have not been actively involved in passing such legislation.
As my constituent whom I have been elected three times to serve, you deserve a response. I must say that I wish you had done a more thorough search of my record regarding women's health issues before you sent a copy of the email to newspapers across the state because you clearly have arrives at a false conclusion.
Let's begin with this just-completed Session. I supported SB 98 to expand Medicaid coverage to offer benefits to uninsured women who are under the age of 65, have been diagnosed with breast or cervical cancer or precancerous conditions, and who are not otherwise covered by insurance. This legislation will enable poor women who often cannot afford insurance to be treated. I voted for SB 98 and Governor Beshear signed it into law on April 10, 2008. Also in this year's Session I voted for HB 316 that required basic health benefits plans to include mammogram screening. It, too, passed and was signed into law on April 24, 2008.
In 2007 I supported SB 11, a bill that excused nursing mothers from jury duty. This was important because doctors are seeing enormous health benefits to both babies and their mothers when the babies are breast fed. I voted for that bill and Governor Fletcher signed it into law on March 23, 2007.
Another bill relating to breastfeeding appeared in 2006. It permitted a mother to breastfeed her baby in any location, public or private. I voted for it as well, and it was signed by Gov. Fletcher on March 28, 2006. Also in that Session I voted for SR 136 recognizing January 2006 as Cervical Cancer Awareness Month.
In 2004 I co-sponsored SB 97 a bill related to breast cancer research, education, awareness, screening, treatment and funding. SB 97 would have established a tax check-off for a newly created Breast Cancer Research and Education Trust Fund. Although the bill had unanimous support in the Senate, it was defeated in the House. In the following year (2005), members of the House Women's Caucus took SB 97 and re-wrote it as a House bill (HB 7) and passed it. Once again, the Senate unanimously passed the bill, and it was signed into law by Governor Fletcher on March 8, 2005.
In 2002 I supported SB 38, an act to require coverage for medical and surgical benefits with respect to a mastectomy. That bill, too, passed unanimously in the Senate and was signed by Governor Patton on April 2, 2002. Also in that year I voted for HB 327, a bill that provided findings to the General Assembly concerning the need for testing and screening of pregnant women for HIV and the likelihood of reducing transmission of HIV from the pregnant women to the unborn or the newborn if knowledge of HIV is known prior to birth. That bill was signed into law by Governor Patton on March 2, 2002. An identical Senate bill (which I voted for) had been killed in the House in 2001.
In 2000, I voted to require health insurers to cover mammograms for any covered person, regardless of age, who has been diagnosed with breast disease. Governor Patton signed that bill (HB 9) into law on February 21, 2000.
There are other bills related to women's health that I supported as well, but I hope these are sufficient to refute your contention that I have not been actively involved in passing such legislation.
I have also supported, as well as sponsored, several bills to require women to be fully informed of the procedures and potential consequences of abortion, the latest being SB 40 which would require a woman to be offered a chance, is she wishes to do so, to see an ultrasound image of her baby before she aborts her. It also would require an abortionist to have a face-to-face meeting with the woman 24 hours before the procedure, so she could be able to ask questions and receive answers before she makes a critical decision that could impact her mental and physical health for years. I am puzzled and disappointed that the Web Page Kentucky Women: Power, Passion and Politics found SB 40 "troubling" since it would only have empowered women with information, otherwise withheld.
Some information, for example, that women generally are not told is that there is strong link between abortion and breast cancer.
Again, I want to thank you for being "upfront and honest" with me, and even though you may feel an urgency to work for my defeat in November, please be assured I will continue to advocate for women's health issues despite that.
Sincerely,
Jack Westwood